University of Wolverhampton
Module Title & Code: Financial Decision Making (7AC009)
Student Name:
Student Number:
Tutor: Mr Oladapo Jayeola
Profitability Analysis
Balanced Scorecard
Investment Appraisal
Report: Royal Dutch Shell PLC
Part 1
Introduction
In this research, I’ll take a close look at Royal Dutch Shell PLC’s profitability for the year 2021. Royal Dutch Shell PLC is one of the biggest oil and gas businesses listed on the FTSE 100 (Shell Annual Report and Accounts 2021, 2021). In order to understand the financial performance of the company over this time, we will evaluate important financial indicators like revenue, net income, gross profit margin, and return on investment (campusbokhandeln.se, 2018). We will also look at how budgeting might help Royal Dutch Shell be more profitable in the coming years.
An international energy firm with its main office in the Netherlands is Royal Dutch Shell PLC. Exploration, production, refining, and distribution are only a few of the oil and gas sector segments it engages in (blackwells.co.uk, 2020). The business has a long history that dates back to the late 19th century, has a significant global presence, and is regarded as a leader in the sector. A wide portfolio of assets, including upstream activities like oil and gas exploration and production and downstream activities like refining and marketing, make up Royal Dutch Shell’s global operations and operations.
Competing in the same market is a key criterion for assessing a company’s performance. We will also quickly present a competitor company in the oil and gas industry to set the stage for our investigation. We will compare ExxonMobil, a significant participant in the sector that is listed on the FTSE 100. We can learn more about Royal Dutch Shell’s strengths, limitations, and market positioning by comparing its financial performance to that of a rival.
The COVID-19 pandemic’s ongoing effects, changes in the price of oil globally, and the shift to renewable energy sources were only a few of the difficulties Royal Dutch Shell faced in 2021 (www.pearson.com, 2020). This analysis intends to assess Royal Dutch Shell’s financial performance for the year 2021 and look into the variables that affected its profitability. We will also explore how budgeting might influence future profitability, taking into account how sound budgeting procedures can influence resource allocation, cost control, and strategic decision-making for the business. We can fully comprehend Royal Dutch Shell’s competitive position within the industry by contrasting its performance to that of ExxonMobil.
Critical Analysis of Royal Dutch Shell PLC’s Profitability in 2021
Royal Dutch Shell Operating Profit Margin Analysis
Royal Dutch Shell was able to turn a profit of 8.2% from every dollar of sales in 2021 after operating costs were taken into consideration thanks to its operational profit margin of 8.2% (Sky News, 2022). The following important elements have an impact on this figure’s insights:
Prices of Oil and Gas: In 2021, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic’s resurgence in global oil demand, oil prices surged (insightplus.bakermckenzie.com, 2021). By increasing revenue from oil-related activities, this upturn had a favourable effect on Royal Dutch Shell’s profitability. However, profitability is at risk due to price fluctuation.
Production and Exploration: The Company’s production and exploration operations are crucial to its financial success. Royal Dutch Shell’s efficiency measures, which were cantered on portfolio rationalization and cost cutting, probably enhanced operational effectiveness and cost management.
A comparison of 2020 and 2021
Operating Profit Margin in 2020: 6.7%
Operating Profit Margin in 2021: 8.2%
Improvement Needed: The recovery in the world’s oil demand and rising oil prices are to blame for the 1.5 percentage point increase from 2020 to 2021. Oil prices and demand were negatively impacted by the pandemic in 2020, which decreased profitability. The following uptick in demand had a favourable impact on Royal Dutch Shell’s profits in 2021.
Royal Dutch Shell’s analysis on gross profit margin
Royal Dutch Shell’s core business activity profitability and skill in controlling production costs were measured in 2021 by its gross profit margin, which the company obtained at 29.4%. The following elements play a role in the dynamics of this ratio:
Refining and Marketing: Due to the sizeable refining and marketing segment, supply chain effectiveness, marketing tactics, and refining margins all have an impact on Royal Dutch Shell’s gross profit margin (Study.com, 2023). Notably, because they are essential to the financial results of this segment, fluctuations in refining margins have a big impact on the company’s overall gross profit margin.
Downstream Investments: The business’s forays into industries like integrated gas and liquefied natural gas (LNG) are crucial to increasing its overall profitability. These tactical expenditures increase Royal Dutch Shell’s ability to turn a profit by focusing on growing markets and diversifying revenue sources.
A comparison of 2020 and 2021
2020: XX% for the gross profit margin
2021: A 29.4% gross profit margin
Motives for the Change Unfortunately, there is no information given for the gross profit margin in 2020. To analyse the shift from 2020 to 2021, however, would include looking at how the company’s gross profit margin has changed as a result of changing margins, market forces, and strategic initiatives.
So, Royal Dutch Shell exhibits efficient cost management of production and strong performance in core business operations with a gross profit margin of 29.4% in 2021. This measure offers information on the company’s profitability and is influenced by various elements, such as refining margins and strategic investments. A peer comparison gives the study more depth and provides a wider grasp of market trends and rivalry.
Royal Dutch Shell’s return on capital employed (ROCE) analysis
Royal Dutch Shell’s efficiency in turning capital into earnings in 2021 was demonstrated by its 5.7% Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) figure. Influential factors for this ratio include:
Capital Expenditure: The capital expenditures made by the company for exploration, production, and projects are crucial in determining its ROCE. By utilizing capital in the most profitable way possible, intelligent investment choices and effective capital allocation help to maximize profitability.
Energy Transition: A notable factor in Royal Dutch Shell’s ROCE is its proactive shift towards greener energy sources including renewable energy and low-carbon options. When compared to conventional oil and gas projects, investments in these sectors could initially produce lower ROCE. As market dynamics and global trends change, these strategic investments are crucial for long-term sustainability and profitability.
A comparison of 2020 and 2021
XX% ROCE in 2020
2021: ROCE – 5.7%
Motives for the Change Unfortunately, there are no ROCE data available for 2020. A more thorough investigation of capital allocation choices, project outcomes, and the effects of the energy transition on profitability would be required to examine the change from 2020 to 2021.
Comparison to a Peer Organization: BP
Operating Profit Margin Comparison: Royal Dutch Shell recorded an operating profit margin of 8.2% in 2021, whereas BP reported 4.9%. In terms of making money from its core operations, this suggests that Royal Dutch Shell outpaced BP (Shell.com, 2022). The increased operating profit margin shows that Royal Dutch Shell handled its operational expenses more profitably by better controlling them.
Comparison of Gross Profit Margin: In the same way, Royal Dutch Shell outperformed BP with a gross profit margin of 29.4% as opposed to 25.7%. This result highlights how Royal Dutch Shell is better able to make money from its core business operations than its rival, BP. But it’s important to recognize that many company-specific circumstances can have an impact on these margins (Shell.com, 2022).
Comparison of Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
It is important to remember that Royal Dutch Shell earned a ROCE of 5.7% in 2021 when comparing ROCE (Rao, 2021). Although information on BP’s ROCE is not included here, a straight comparison would reveal how well each business used capital to produce profits. These outcomes are influenced by variables like capital allocation, project effectiveness, and strategy choices.
Royal Dutch Shell’s superior success in generating profit from core operations and business activities is highlighted when comparing its profitability to that of BP, a competitor in the oil and gas industry. Royal Dutch Shell has favourable operating and gross profit margins, which reflects its skill in cost control and operational effectiveness (Digitalcommons@pace, Tsui and Chee, 2011). However, these comparisons can be impacted by the specifics of each company’s portfolio structure, geographic reach, and strategy choices, necessitating careful analysis when inferring information about their comparative performance.
Advantages and Limitations of Ratios:
Profitability ratios provide valuable insights into a company’s financial performance. They allow for comparisons over time and against industry peers. However, it is important to note the limitations of these ratios. Factors to consider include:
Industry Specifics: Different industries have varying profit margins, which makes it essential to compare profitability ratios within the same sector. Comparing ratios across different industries may lead to inaccurate conclusions.
External Factors: Profitability ratios do not capture the impact of external factors such as economic conditions, regulatory changes, or geopolitical events. These factors can significantly influence a company’s profitability and need to be considered alongside ratio analysis.
Finally, Royal Dutch Shell’s profitability in 2021 was influenced by factors such as oil and gas prices, exploration and production performance, refining and marketing margins, and investments in the energy transition (Shell Annual Report and Accounts 2021, 2022). Key ratios, including operating profit margin, gross profit margin, and ROCE, provide insights into the company’s financial performance. While a comparison with BP suggests Royal Dutch Shell performed better in terms of profitability, it is essential to consider industry-specific dynamics and individual company factors when assessing profitability.
The Role of Budgeting in Improving Profitability in Future Years
Budgeting plays a crucial role in improving profitability for companies like Royal Dutch Shell PLC. By implementing effective budgeting practices, organizations can plan and allocate resources efficiently, minimize costs, and identify opportunities for revenue growth. The following sub-headings discuss how budgeting can contribute to improving the performance of the company:
Planning:
Budgeting involves setting financial targets and developing a roadmap for achieving them. It enables Royal Dutch Shell to align its operations and investments with its strategic objectives. Through the budgeting process, the company can identify potential risks and opportunities, anticipate future financial needs, and plan for capital expenditures and resource allocation.
Coordinating:
Budgeting facilitates coordination and communication across different departments and levels of the organization. By involving key stakeholders in the budgeting process, Royal Dutch Shell can enhance collaboration, foster accountability, and ensure that everyone is working towards common financial goals. It promotes a unified approach to resource allocation and decision-making, leading to improved efficiency and profitability.
Controlling:
Budgets serve as a control mechanism by providing a benchmark against which actual performance can be measured. By comparing actual financial results to the budgeted figures, Royal Dutch Shell can identify areas of variance and take timely corrective actions. Variance analysis helps in monitoring and managing revenue and costs, allowing the company to optimize its operations and improve profitability.
Motivating:
Budgeting can serve as a motivational tool for employees. By involving them in the budgeting process and setting achievable targets, Royal Dutch Shell can foster a sense of ownership and accountability. Clear financial goals and performance expectations can motivate employees to perform better, leading to increased productivity and profitability.
However, it is important to acknowledge some of the behavioural drawbacks of budgets, as highlighted by Atrill & McLaney (2018). These include:
Rigidity and Lack of Adaptability: Budgets are often based on assumptions and forecasts that may not accurately reflect changing market conditions (Atrill, 2020). In dynamic industries like oil and gas, unexpected events can significantly impact profitability. Rigid adherence to budgets without flexibility can hinder the company’s ability to adapt to changing circumstances.
Gaming and Ethical Issues: In some cases, managers may manipulate budgets to achieve favourable outcomes or meet targets. This can lead to unethical practices such as inflating revenue or understating costs. Such behaviours can distort financial results and compromise the integrity of budgeting.
Despite these drawbacks, budgets are still widely used by large organizations like Royal Dutch Shell. This is because budgeting provides several benefits and can be complemented with additional tools and frameworks for performance evaluation. For instance:
Variance Analysis: Royal Dutch Shell can use variance analysis to compare actual financial results with the budgeted figures. This helps in identifying areas of underperformance or cost overruns, allowing the company to take corrective actions and improve profitability.
Royal Dutch Shell’s Balanced Scorecard for Performance Evaluation
A thorough framework for measuring performance that takes into account both financial and non-financial variables is provided by the balanced scorecard. With the use of this method, Royal Dutch Shell is able to evaluate the financial performance of its business alongside other critical indicators like employee happiness, environmental impact, and adherence to corporate governance norms. This all-encompassing viewpoint is consistent with the company’s dedication to sustainable value development and ethical business practices.
Benefits and Relevance of the Balanced Scorecard: The balanced scorecard is extremely relevant since it provides a thorough assessment of a company’s performance. It fosters a broader knowledge of value creation by going beyond conventional financial measurements to include factors that have a substantial impact on long-term success. Non-financial indicators offer perceptions into stakeholder management, moral behaviour, and general sustainability—aspects that are becoming more and more important in today’s socially conscious company environment.
Royal Dutch Shell can use non-financial Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to evaluate performance in a variety of areas:
Customer Satisfaction: By monitoring customer satisfaction levels, Royal Dutch Shell can make sure that its goods and services meet the needs and expectations of its clients, boosting customer loyalty and market share.
Employee Satisfaction, Engagement, and Retention: Monitoring these factors contributes to the development of a motivated staff. Increased productivity, inventiveness, and overall organizational resilience are all benefits of contented workers.
Public Perception and Trust: Tracking how the public feels about the business’s operations and business procedures reflects on the company’s reputation and societal impact. A favourable public perception can increase brand loyalty and sustain support.
With greater understanding and regulatory compliance, Royal Dutch Shell is making progress towards minimising its ecological effect, which demonstrates its dedication to environmental sustainability. To encourage performance improvement, the organisation uses non-financial criteria from the balanced scorecard. Data on customer satisfaction guides changes to products and services, insights into employee morale drive morale-boosting actions, and insights into public perception foresee future problems. Successes in environmental sustainability are consistent with moral principles and good will among stakeholders. The integrated nature of the balanced scorecard strengthens stakeholder relationships, employee welfare, reputation, and sustainability objectives. For Shell, the importance of budgeting in raising profitability is critical. Even with behavioural limitations, budgeting is still a useful tool for managing finances. By adding variance analysis, a balanced scorecard strategy, and a number of KPIs that represent its dedication to ethical business practises, Shell can optimise budgeting, advancing its ethical and value-driven corporate goal.
Conclusion
Finally, Royal Dutch Shell PLC outperforms peer firm BP in operating profit margin and gross profit margin according to its 2021 profitability estimate. Profitability was influenced by elements including the recovery in the price of oil and effective portfolio management. The business’s 5.7% ROCE demonstrates effective capital allocation. For Shell’s future, budgeting’s contribution to increasing profitability is crucial. In addition to assessing financial and non-financial metrics, effective practises support strategic planning, resource coordination, performance control, and employee motivation. Budgets continue to be useful in financial management despite problems like rigidity and possibly unethical practises, when combined with tools like variance analysis and the balanced scorecard. Customer satisfaction, employee engagement, public trust, and environmental sustainability should all be included in key performance indicators (KPIs) in addition to financial metrics. An all-encompassing budgeting strategy, supported by a variety of KPIs, will boost profitability, connect operations with strategic goals, and sustain ethical business practises. Shell will be positioned for sustainable profitability in the future through cost management, resource optimisation, and embracing the energy shift.
Part 2
Investment Appraisal and Financing for a 30-Year Life Project: Royal Dutch Shell PLC
Introduction
In this section, it will be evaluated the investment assessment approaches that Royal Dutch Shell PLC should use to decide whether to invest in a big project with a 30-year life (Washington, 2018). We will also critically examine how different funding sources may affect this choice. It is critical to pick the appropriate investment evaluation technique and financing plan given the project’s specifics, the company’s profile, and financial history.
The Best Investment Appraisal Method for a Big-Scale Purchase:
Investment appraisal’s definition and significance are as follows: It is a methodical process that involves assessing the financial viability and potential worthiness of possible projects. Finding out whether the 30-year life project is feasible and has potential value is a crucial first step for Royal Dutch Shell (Li, 2020). Analysing the projected cash flows and returns that the project is expected to provide during its lifetime is the central focus of this approach. Investment evaluation offers a formal framework to evaluate the potential risks and benefits connected with the project, which aids in making wise decisions. This assessment is essential for Royal Dutch Shell to make sure that the technique chosen is consistent with the company’s overarching long-term goals and takes the vital time value of money into consideration.
Principal Investment Appraisal Methods:
Various Investment Assessment Methods: Determining the Viability of a Project
Investment assessment includes a variety of methods, each of which adds a different viewpoint to determine a project’s viability. Payback Period, Accounting Rate of Return (ARR), Net Present Value (NPV), and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) are four well-known approaches that stand out for providing unique insights. Even if each approach has pros and cons of its own, their combined use offers a thorough evaluation of a project’s financial viability.
1. The Payback Period stresses how long it takes for an investment to recover its initial costs. This method offers a rapid evaluation of how quickly the investment produces returns. But it fails to take into account cash flows that occur after the payback period and ignores the time value of money, potentially missing out on long-term profitability (GoCardless, 2022).
2. Accounting Rate of Return (ARR): ARR figures out how much money is made on average per year in relation to the initial investment (GoCardless, 2022). It is accessible due to its simplicity and dependence on readily available financial data. However, it ignores cash flow timing, only considers accounting numbers, and does not take time value of money into account.
3. Net Present Value (NPV): Using a selected discount rate, NPV analyses future cash flows by discounting them to present value (CFI, 2023). A project with a positive NPV is theoretically viable. The time value of money is taken into account by NPV, which sheds light on real profitability. However, it is reliant on precise cash flow projections and necessitates picking the right discount rate.
4. Internal Rate of Return (IRR): IRR calculates the point at which a project’s net present value (NPV) equals zero, i.e., the required minimum return. It assists in comparing projects to the cost of capital and takes into account the time value of money. IRR, however, presents difficulties when contrasting projects that are mutually exclusive and can produce various results.
Holistic Financial Viability Assessment: While each technique has certain advantages and disadvantages, using them all at once offers a more thorough comprehension of a project’s financial prospects (energypedia.info, 2022). Decision-makers can triangulate their evaluations and account for diverse aspects that affect project success by taking into consideration the findings from all four methodologies.
The best strategy for Royal Dutch Shell
The Net Present Value (NPV) method is the best option given Royal Dutch Shell’s significant influence in the energy industry and the project’s lengthy 30-year time-table. NPV stands out because it fully takes into account the time value of money and discounts future cash flows to their present value. This method addresses the inherent uncertainty associated with long-term investments by allowing for the precise assessment of cash flows across a number of years, making it particularly well-suited for projects with longer durations.
The project’s whole life cycle is taken into account by NPV, giving a comprehensive picture of its profitability. This is the heart of financial conservatism. A project with a positive NPV outcome is anticipated to generate value above and beyond the initial investment, which will benefit Royal Dutch Shell’s financial performance (Washington, 2018). NPV is an excellent option for a corporation involved in a 30-year life project, like Royal Dutch Shell, due to its intrinsic capacity to incorporate complex cash flow patterns, account for the impact of inflation, and discount future earnings back to their current value. The application of NPV is consistent with Royal Dutch Shell’s strategic strategy, which places a high priority on long-term sustainability and the enhancement of shareholder wealth. By using NPV, the business may statistically evaluate the project’s prospective effects on its financial situation and decide whether to move through with the acquisition with confidence. This method is a reasonable and advantageous choice for Royal Dutch Shell’s appraisal of the large-scale acquisition project since it can take the time value of money into account and is suitable for long-term investments.
Finally, In order to evaluate the viability and potential value of a big 30-year project, Royal Dutch Shell must first complete the investment evaluation procedure (Andersson, 2020). The Net Present Value (NPV) technique stands out as the best option among the existing investment appraisal methods since it can take time value of money into account and offer a thorough analysis of the project’s financial impact. NPV is in line with Royal Dutch Shell’s emphasis on long-term sustainability and maximizing shareholder wealth. The corporation may ensure that its decision-making process is supported by quantitative analysis by using NPV, which will allow it to make educated decisions about the ambitious purchase endeavour.
Benefits and NPV’s Limitations
Benefits of NPV: For a firm like Royal Dutch Shell assessing a substantial 30-year life project, the Net Present Value (NPV) technique offers a number of benefits that make it a preferred option for investment appraisal:
Clear Value Evaluation: NPV gives a straightforward and transparent evaluation of the prospective worth of the project (The Motley Fool, 2015). NPV provides a concrete measure of whether the project is expected to positively impact the company’s financial performance by calculating the difference between the present value of future cash flows and the initial investment.
Consideration of Time Value of Money: NPV considers the time value of money, acknowledging that a dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow (Finance Focused, 2020). A more realistic comparison of inflows and outflows over time is made possible by NPV, which makes sure that all cash flows are returned back to their present value by discounting future cash flows.
A Comprehensive Perspective on Cash Flows: NPV combines cash flows across the course of the project, providing a full picture of the financial ramifications. This enables Royal Dutch Shell to assess the project’s long-term viability while taking into account changes and variations in cash flows.
Limitations of NPV
NPV has some substantial advantages, but it also has certain drawbacks that should be carefully considered:
NPV calculations heavily rely on estimates of the future and assumptions regarding elements like cash flows, discount rates, and inflation rates. As a result, uncertainties and variances in these parameters have the potential to reduce the precision of NPV results.
Sensitivity to Assumptions: Significant variations in NPV results can result from even minor modifications to fundamental premises. This sensitivity can be particularly problematic in long-term initiatives, like the 30-year project for Royal Dutch Shell, because it can be difficult to precisely foresee future conditions.
Risk reduction by way of scenario analysis
Royal Dutch Shell could use scenario analysis to solve the NPV limits and improve the decision-making process, especially given the project’s extensive time horizon:
The importance of scenario analysis is that it includes taking into account numerous conceivable possibilities that could affect the project’s results. Scenario analysis is essential for Royal Dutch Shell’s investment evaluation given the project’s lengthy 30-year lifetime. The organization can use this study to determine how sensitive the project is to various market situations, technological advancements, legislative changes, and other pertinent factors.
The benefits of scenario analysis are as follows:
Risk reduction: Royal Dutch Shell can identify potential risks and difficulties related to the project by examining several scenarios (Shell Annual Report and Accounts 2021, 2022). This gives the business the ability to create strategies and contingency plans to lessen unfavourable results.
Recognition of Opportunities: Scenario analysis aids in locating prospective opportunities that might present themselves in various situations. When only one set of assumptions is taken into account, these opportunities might not be obvious.
Making Informed Decisions: Royal Dutch Shell has a more complete understanding of the various consequences of the project by taking into account a range of scenarios (Group, 2022). A variety of potential futures are considered in more informed decision-making that results from this improved understanding.
Royal Dutch Shell can take into account risks and fluctuations by including scenario analysis into the investment evaluation process, which strengthens the decision-making process. This strategy is in line with the company’s dedication to careful analysis and strategic planning, especially for an investment with such a lengthy time horizon. Royal Dutch Shell can make decisions that are more in line with its broader goals and risk tolerance by analysing the project’s performance under various scenarios.
Factors to Take into Account When Choosing Financing Sources
External funding for Large-Scale Acquisition: Due to the size of the capital required and the prolonged term of the investment, external funding becomes essential in the context of a significant 30-year life project (Cepal.org, 2016). In order to fulfil its commitment to this project, Royal Dutch Shell must find appropriate outside funding sources that complement its long-term goals and financial plan.
Equity Finance: This type of financing involves issuing shares to raise money and provide investors ownership holdings. The benefits and disadvantages of this approach should be carefully considered by Royal Dutch Shell.
Benefits of Equity Financing
No Dividend Obligations: Using equity financing does not obligate you to pay dividends in the future. Royal Dutch Shell may benefit from this flexibility, especially during difficult financial times when it may be difficult to pay fixed debt obligations.
Financial Risk Reduced: Unlike debt financing, equity financing does not require interest payments, lowering the financial risk and fixed financial commitments for the company (gsh.cib.natixis.com, 2021).
Drawback of equity financing
Equity Dilution: Issuing more shares dilutes current shareholders’ ownership, potentially diminishing their ability to influence and control the company’s choices (Thaler, 1999).
Loss of Control: Increased ownership by outside shareholders may result in Royal Dutch Shell losing managerial control. This can have an effect on the company’s long-term goals and strategic decision-making.
Debt Financing: Borrowing money from banks, bond markets, or other financial institutions is referred to as debt financing. It has its own set of benefits and drawbacks, which Royal Dutch Shell should consider:
Benefits of Debt Financing
Debt financing is the technique of obtaining capital for a company from outside lenders like banks, financial institutions, or bondholders. Numerous advantages of this approach may be helpful for businesses like Royal Dutch Shell. An explanation of the advantages of debt financing is provided below:
Rapid Capital Access: Debt finance offers a speedy and very simple means for businesses to obtain capital. For Royal Dutch Shell, being able to quickly access funds might be essential for a variety of reasons, including funding new projects, expanding operations, or taking care of sudden financial needs. Debt financing can be carried out more quickly than equity funding, which may involve more difficult procedures like issuing new shares and luring investors.
Debt financing can be completed more quickly than equity funding, which may entail more complicated procedures like issuing new shares and luring investors, allowing the business to take advantage of time-sensitive possibilities.
Cost-Effectiveness: When compared to equity financing, debt financing has the potential to be more cost-effective. While interest payments to lenders are a requirement of debt, they are typically smaller than the dividends or profits expected by equity investors. As a result, the organization may incur lower overall borrowing costs. When seeking finance, Royal Dutch Shell may be able to save money by favouring debt over stock.
Leveraging Low Interest Rates: When interest rates are low, as they are occasionally in many economies, debt financing is more alluring. Businesses like Royal Dutch Shell can access capital while paying fewer borrowing costs by borrowing at lower interest rates (https://www.facebook.com/CNBC, 2023). This may increase profitability and financial flexibility, enabling the business to use resources more effectively and make investments in projects that will spur further growth.
Tax Deductibility: For businesses, interest payments on debt are frequently deductible expenses. This results in possible tax savings because the amount of interest paid lowers the company’s taxable revenue. This feature of debt financing has the potential to significantly benefit Royal Dutch Shell by lowering its overall tax burden. The business can improve its tax position and devote more resources to value-creating endeavours by reducing its taxable income.
Ownership Control Is Maintained: Debt financing does not weaken ownership control. When a business acquires money through equity financing, it frequently entails the issuance of new shares, which can dilute the ownership of current shareholders (De Jong and Roell, 2003). Due to the ability to maintain its current ownership structure thanks to debt financing, Royal Dutch Shell has more autonomy and influence over its business operations and strategic choices.
Payback Flexibility: Debt finance frequently offers greater payback schedule flexibility. Based on the company’s financial status and projected cash flow, lenders and borrowers can negotiate repayment arrangements, such as interest rates and repayment intervals (Practical Law, 2023). This adaptability enables the organization to manage its debt in a way that is consistent with its revenue cycles and business cycles.
Finally, debt financing provides Royal Dutch Shell and other companies with a number of advantages that can help them. The opportunity to leverage low interest rates, the ability to deduct interest payments from taxes, the maintenance of ownership control, quick access to cash, cost-effectiveness compared to equity financing, and flexibility in repayment terms are some of these benefits. Before choosing debt financing, businesses should carefully evaluate their financial situation and risk appetite, as high debt levels can potentially result in financial risks.
Drawback of debt financing
Increased Financial Risk: Royal Dutch Shell is at more risk financially as a result of taking on debt because it is required to make interest and principal payments regardless of its financial performance.
Interest Expense Payments: The profitability and cash flows of the organization may be impacted by interest payments on debt. The company’s financial resources could be put under strain by high debt servicing levels.
High debt levels may have an impact on Royal Dutch Shell’s credit rating, which could result in future increases in borrowing rates.
Pecking Order idea of Finance: According to this idea, internal financing (retained profits), followed by debt and equity, is the preferred method of financing for businesses. Royal Dutch Shell should follow this order when choosing a finance option (Frank, Goyal and Shen, 2020). When internal resources are insufficient, debt financing might be pursued to avoid the costs connected with external sources. Only when internal and debt options are inadequate or unfavourable can equity funding be sought.
Currency matching: it is essential to reducing currency risk. It compares the currencies of investments and loan financing (Default, 2022). This strategy protects Royal Dutch Shell from potential losses brought on by currency rate swings even if they accept slightly higher interest rates. This is especially important for a business with international operations and investments made in various currencies.
Risk and long-term objectives should be balanced in the choice of funding for Royal Dutch Shell
Royal Dutch Shell must make a crucial choice on the best financial sources in order to support a 30-year project. It is crucial to carefully consider factors including risk tolerance, financial plan, and long-term goals. Furthermore, it is crucial to take into account the project’s particular financial environment.
Selecting between Debt and Equity Financing: For Royal Dutch Shell, choosing the right ratio of debt to equity financing is a crucial decision (reports.shell.com, 2020). Equity finance requires raising money by selling ownership holdings, whereas debt financing involves borrowing money, generally through bonds or loans. Every strategy has unique benefits and implications that need to be thoroughly thought out.
Debt Financing: By choosing this option, Royal Dutch Shell is able to use borrowed money to carry out the project without diluting ownership. Tax deductions for interest payments on the debt lower the true cost of borrowing. However, because of interest payments and other debt responsibilities, excessive debt might result in higher financial risk. Due to the project’s lengthy lifespan, the business must make sure that its cash flows are reliable and sufficient to pay off debt in the long run.
Equity Financing: Selling firm stock is one method of acquiring money through equity financing. It increases the firm’s equity foundation while lowering the financial risk brought on by excessive debt levels (www.bloomberg.com, 2022). Equity investors do not impose fixed interest payments but do bear a portion of earnings. However, the ownership and voting power of current shareholders may be diluted as a result of equity issuance.
Finding the Right Balance: Royal Dutch Shell’s risk appetite, financial goals, and the project’s long-term viability all play a role in selecting the best debt or equity financing option. In order to leverage the project while preserving financial stability, a balanced strategy can combine loan and equity funding. The viability of debt financing is greatly influenced by variables like interest rates, market conditions, and the company’s creditworthiness.
Conclusion
In light of its consideration of the time value of money and thorough cash flow analysis, the Net Present Value (NPV) technique is the most appropriate investment assessment method for Royal Dutch Shell’s substantial 30-year life project (Andersson, 2020). To account for uncertainties, the business should use scenario analysis to solve the NPV limits. External funding is crucial for financing, and depending on the company’s risk appetite and long-term objectives, a combination of stock and debt financing should be taken into account (Zancanella and Bertoldi, 2018). The project’s financial stability will be enhanced through adherence to the pecking order theory and currency matching rules. The 30-year project can be made successful and profitable by Royal Dutch Shell by carefully weighing investment evaluation and finance options.
Reference
Atrill, P. (2020). Financial Management for Decision Makers. [online] Available at: http://202.51.74.123/bitstream/123456789/613/1/BM-591%20Financial%20management%20for%20decision%20makers%20by%20Peter%20Atrill.pdf.
Andersson, J. (2020). Ghost in a Shell: The Scenario Tool and the World Making of Royal Dutch Shell. Business History Review, 94(4), pp.729–751. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007680520000483.
blackwells.co.uk. (2020). Accounting for Non-Accounting Students. [online] Available at: https://blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/product/Accounting-for-Non-Accounting-Students-by-J-R-Dyson-Ellie-Franklin/9781292286938 [Accessed 10 Jul. 2023].
campusbokhandeln.se. (2018). Management Accounting for Decision Makers 9th edition | 9781292204574 // campusbokhandeln.se. [online] Available at: https://campusbokhandeln.se/b/9781292204574/management-accounting-for-decision-makers-9th-edition [Accessed 10 Jul. 2023].
CFI (2023). Net Present Value (NPV). [online] Corporate Finance Institute. Available at: https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/valuation/net-present-value-npv/.
Cepal.org. (2016). Available at: https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/40214/S1600662_en.pdf.txt [Accessed 13 Aug. 2023].
Default. (2022). International NPV calculations. [online] Available at: https://kfknowledgebank.kaplan.co.uk/international-npv-calculations- [Accessed 13 Aug. 2023].
dokumen.pub. (2020). Financial management for decision makers [Ninth ed.] 9781292311432, 1292311436. [online] Available at: https://dokumen.pub/financial-management-for-decision-makers-ninthnbsped-9781292311432-1292311436.html.
Digitalcommons@pace, D., Tsui, T. and Chee (2011). Interstate Comparison -Use of Contribution Margin in Interstate Comparison -Use of Contribution Margin in Determination of Price Fixing Determination of Price Fixing. [online] Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1024&context=pilronline [Accessed 13 Aug. 2023].
De Jong, A. and Roell, A. (2003). Title: Financing and Control in The Netherlands: A Historical Perspective. [online] ISBN, pp.0–226. Available at: https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c10275/c10275.pdf.
energypedia.info. (2022). SPIS Toolbox – Assess Financial Viability – energypedia. [online] Available at: https://energypedia.info/wiki/SPIS_Toolbox_-_Assess_Financial_Viability [Accessed 13 Aug. 2023].
Finance Focused. (2020). The Time Value of Money & Net Present Value. [online] Available at: https://finfoc.com/how-do-financial-managers-make-investment-decisions-the-time-value-of-money-net-present-value/.
Frank, M.Z., Goyal, V.K. and Shen, T. (2020). The Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure: Where Do We Stand? [online] papers.ssrn.com. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3540610.
Group, E. (2022). Shell’s Corporate Foresight Journey. [online] Embiggen Group. Available at: https://embiggengroup.com/insights/shells-corporate-foresight-journey/.
GoCardless (2022). How to calculate the payback period. [online] gocardless.com. Available at: https://gocardless.com/guides/posts/how-to-calculate-payback-period/.
GoCardless (2022). Accounting Rate of Return (ARR) | Definition & Formula. [online] gocardless.com. Available at: https://gocardless.com/guides/posts/calculating-accounting-rate-of-return/.
gsh.cib.natixis.com. (2021). A Dutch Court orders Shell to reduce its emissions – a harbinger of the climate litigation era | Our Center of Expertise. [online] Available at: https://gsh.cib.natixis.com/our-center-of-expertise/articles/a-dutch-court-orders-shell-to-reduce-its-emissions-a-harbinger-of-the-climate-litigation-era.
https://www.facebook.com/CNBC (n.d.). Check out Leverage Shares 3x Royal Dutch Shell ETP Securities’s stock price (RSH3-GB) in real time. [online] CNBC. Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/RSH3-GB [Accessed 13 Aug. 2023].
Is Shell serious about its climate transition plan? (2021). Available at: https://www.accr.org.au/downloads/2021-04-30_accr-in-depth-royal-dutch-shell-plc-shell-climate-vote.pdf [Accessed 10 Jul. 2023].
insightplus.bakermckenzie.com. (2021). International: The Impact of COVID-19 on the Oil & Gas Industry. [online] Available at: https://insightplus.bakermckenzie.com/bm/energy-mining-infrastructure_1/international-the-impact-of-covid-19-on-the-oil-gas-industry_2.
Li, Z.-X., Liu, J.-Y., Luo, D.-K. and Wang, J.-J. (2020). Study of evaluation method for the overseas oil and gas investment based on risk compensation. Petroleum Science, 17(3), pp.858–871. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-020-00457-7.
Practical Law. (2023). Acquisition Finance in the Netherlands: Overview. [online] Available at: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/4-628-3166?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default) [Accessed 13 Aug. 2023].
reports.shell.com. (2020). Disclaimer – Shell Annual Report 2020. [online] Available at: https://reports.shell.com/annual-report/2020/strategic-report/liquidity-and-capital-resources.php.
Rao, S.G. (2021). Royal Dutch Shell Earnings: Top-Line Efficiency (NYSE:RDS.A) (NYSE:RDS.B) | Seeking Alpha. [online] seekingalpha.com. Available at: https://seekingalpha.com/article/4468331-royal-dutch-shell-rds-earnings-top-line-efficiency [Accessed 13 Aug. 2023].
Sky News. (2022). Energy company Shell reported profits of over £8bn – but why does it matter? [online] Available at: https://news.sky.com/video/energy-company-shell-reported-profits-of-over-8bn-but-why-does-it-matter-12731305 [Accessed 13 Aug. 2023].
Study.com. (2023). Available at: https://study.com/academy/lesson/shell-plc-history-logo-facts-royal-dutch.html [Accessed 13 Aug. 2023].
Shell.com. (2022). Available at: https://reports.shell.com/annual-report/2021/_scripts/download.php?file=shell-annual-report-2021.pdf&id=1273.
Shell Annual Report and Accounts 2021. (2022). Summary of results. [online] Available at: https://reports.shell.com/annual-report/2021/strategic-report/summary-of-results.html.
Shell Annual Report and Accounts 2021. (2021). Summary of results. [online] Available at: https://reports.shell.com/annual-report/2021/strategic-report/summary-of-results.html.
Shell Annual Report and Accounts 2021. (2022). Risk factors. [online] Available at: https://reports.shell.com/annual-report/2021/strategic-report/risk-factors.html.
The Motley Fool (2015). Advantages and Disadvantages of Net Present Value Method. [online] www.nasdaq.com. Available at: https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/advantages-and-disadvantages-net-present-value-method-2015-11-14.
Thomas, P. (2018). Should I buy more Shell shares for the 5.7% dividend. [online] This is Money. Available at: https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/investing/article-5276831/INVESTMENT-CLINIC-buy-Shell-shares.html [Accessed 10 Jul. 2023].
Thaler, R.H. (1999). The End of Behavioral Finance. Financial Analysts Journal, [online] 55(6), pp.12–17. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4480205 [Accessed 2 Dec. 2022].
www.pearson.com. (2020). Franklin, Accounting for Non-Accounting Students 10th Edition. [online] Available at: https://www.pearson.com/se/Nordics-Higher-Education/subject-catalogue/accounting-and-taxation/Franklin-Accounting-for-non-accounting-students-10th-edition.html [Accessed 10 Jul. 2023].
Washington, D. (2018). UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Form 20-F ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. [online] Available at: https://shell.gcs-web.com/static-files/548074c8-9ff1-4e08-9c69-ffd2c081f875.
www.bloomberg.com. (2022). Bloomberg – Are you a robot? [online] Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-29/shell-to-buy-back-2-billion-of-shares-this-year-as-profit-jumps.
Zancanella, P. and Bertoldi, P. (2018). Energy efficiency, the value of buildings and the payment default risk. [online] doi:https://doi.org/10.2760/267367.